James Fallows has a round-up of U.S. Senate filibuster commentary, including a note by a lawyer friend that sheds some light on what the framers of the Constitution might think of the 60-vote rule.
As Fallows' friend notes, one of the few defined responsibilities given to the Vice President is: "The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided."
Of course, if 60-votes is the new requirement to do anything in the 100-member body, the Senate shall never be equally divided. The filibuster robs the Vice President of one of his or her few actual Constitutional responsibilities!
This Constitutional travesty is just one of many reasons the filibuster should be eliminated.
Leave a comment