Corporate Taxes Are Not "Double Taxation"
Dean Baker offers this outstanding argument against the radical conservative talking point that corporate taxes represent double taxation.
The trick in this argument is that it ignores the enormous benefits that the government is granting by allowing a corporation to exist as a free standing legal entity. The most important of these advantages is limited liability. If a corporation produces dangerous products or emits dangerous substances that result in thousands of deaths, shareholders in the corporation cannot be held personally responsible for the damage. The corporation can go bankrupt, but beyond that point, all the shareholders are off the hook, the victims of the damage are just out of luck.By granting corporate status, the government has allowed investors to shift risk to society as a whole. In exchange for this and other privileges of corporate status, the corporation must pay income tax on its earnings. We know that investors consider the benefits of corporate status to be worth the price in the form of the corporate income tax, because they voluntarily choose to form corporations. If investors did not consider the benefits of corporate status to outweigh the cost of the income tax, then they are free to form partnerships which are not subject to corporate income tax. In this way, the corporate income tax is a completely voluntary tax. Anyone can avoid the tax by investing in a partnership, or alternatively, any corporation can be restructured as a partnership.
Hopefully people will realize this and stop hoping our government gives the most affluent another handout.
Comments
>>>enormous benefits that the government is granting by allowing a corporation to exist as a free standing legal entity
Craig, I am not against reasonable taxation, but the statement above is almost medieval about the role of government.
That one would still argue the statist position that government is the sole source of the rights of all social institutions (e.g. intermediary organizations per Daniel Mpynihan.) is breath taking to say the least.
Institutions have rights that are original to themselves, i.e. family, marriage, worship, free associations, business, labor...sure these all have a public side to them to interact in the public space, but they do not originate in the state.
To enslave all social institutions as creatures of the crown or state is totalitarian and mercantilistic and plain wrong thinking.
Posted by: Bill Gram-Reefer | September 7, 2008 10:19 AM
Hi, Bill!
This comment is only about the specific organization known as the corporation. Neither Dean Baker nor I are arguing, as you state, "that government is the sole source of the rights of all social institutions."
Corporations are a specific legal entity created by the government. This legal entity provides specific advantages which I do not believe should be given away without cost.
That's all this post was about.
-- Craig
Posted by: Craig Cheslog | September 7, 2008 10:50 AM