TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference :
» Free Column Space for Candidates from Our Common Asset: The Electoral System
Minnesota Senate candidate Norm Coleman's campaign pitched a weekly column to newspapers throughout the state. Newspaper editors and publishers reacted [Read More]
» Consistency from The Trommetter Times
Libertarians are the only ideological activists I know of whose actions are consistent with their own principles. They don't [Read More]
» Controlling Information from Generations and Turnings
San Jose Mercury News columnist Dan Gillmor writes about the proposed "Peer to Peer Piracy Prevention Act,'' which would give [Read More]
» The Year Politics Got Serious from Taegan Goddard's Political Wire
Will 2002 be dubbed "the year politics got serious?" Tuesday's primary defeats of Rep. Bob Barr and Rep. Cynthia McKinney -- polar opposites on the political spectrum, but equally controversial -- have expanded the list of so-called "colorful" politici... [Read More]
» Watermelons in Africa from The Trommetter Times
Johannesburg, South Africa is filled with watermelons. Well-meaning, but misguided people who are "green on the outside, but red [Read More]
» First Amendment Support Waning? from TalkLeft: The Politics of Crime
Through Political Parrhesia we found the 2002 First Amendment Report disclosing that support for the First Amendment has declined. 49 [Read More]
» Greasy Kid's Stuff from the RANT:
The Venezuelan oil strike has pushed crude prices up to a 22-month high this week as the political opponents of President Hugo Chavez ratchet up the pressure to "re-oust" the embattled leader. While the complexities of the Venezuelan conflict escape [Read More]
» Tax Cut Time from the RANT:
The Bush economic stimulus plan was unveiled yesterday by announcing a package of targeted tax cuts designed to encourage businesses and investors to create jobs. Democrats, predictably, want to see stimulus aimed at consumers. Democratic critics point... [Read More]
» Tax Cuts, is there anything they can't do? from the RANT:
One of the big problems that I have with the Bush administration is their propensity to decide on a policy initiative and then figure out a way to "market" it. The dividend tax cut is a great case in point. [Read More]
» Around the Horn from the RANT:
Browsing the Blogroll this morning, lot of good stuff out there. I have made the effort to summarize and catalog for your reading pleasure. Calpundit scores big with an interview of the creative force behind the Talking point Memo, Joshua [Read More]
» Fun with Math from the RANT:
This year the Presidents proposed budget is in the neighborhood of 2.3 trillion dollars. Federal revenues are currently running about 1.4 trillion (unless you count payroll tax money and I don’t because that is money that the government, presumably, has [Read More]
» The Non-Debate from the RANT:
Craig Cheslog, Political Parrhesia, asks the not so musical question, what the hell are they afraid of? Citing an article by Thomas Oliphant which makes the point that while other democracies around the world are revisiting the Iraqi war questions [Read More]
» The Non-Debate from the RANT:
Craig Cheslog, Political Parrhesia, asks the not so musical question, what the hell are they afraid of? Citing an article by Thomas Oliphant which makes the point that while other democracies around the world are revisiting the Iraqi war questions [Read More]
» Money Matters from the RANT:
OK so I've been hanging around Political Parrhesia, and if you can’t say it, you should at least read it. Craig has dug up some information that reinforces a lot of what I have been saying regarding the direction the [Read More]
» Money Matters from the RANT:
OK so I've been hanging around Political Parrhesia, and if you can’t say it, you should at least read it. Craig has dug up some information that reinforces a lot of what I have been saying regarding the direction the [Read More]
» Is Bagram AFB a Torture Facility? from TalkLeft: The Politics of Crime
Georgetown Law Professor Jonathan Turley writes about reports that Bagram Air Force Base in Afganistan is being used as an... [Read More]
» The Shark Attack from the RANT:
With coalition forces attempt to secure Baghdad, American firms are fighting to secure lucrative contracts in Iraq, Craig Cheslog chronicles the feeding frenzy. Citing an article by Matt Miller that discusses the campaign to profit from the war there is [Read More]
» The Verdict is In, Finally from the RANT:
I have often maintained that the US has the best judicial system in the world, but that it s not a complement. It is more of a commentary of the sorry state of judicial procedure here and in the rest... [Read More]
» The Day the Music Stopped from Modulator
This evening Political Parrhesia led me over to TalkLeft who urges us to speak up against an effort by Sen Joseph Biden (D-Del) to do some Ashcroftian dirty work. If you think you are not going to be affected you... [Read More]
» In Harm's Way from the RANT:
The recent fad of equating partisan dissent with the presidents policy in Iraq with boraderline treason would be funny if it weren't for the fact that so many people seem to agree with it 100%. That's not funny, it's scary.... [Read More]
» Around the blogosphere... from Rhetorica: Press-Politics Journal
Cal Pundit: Tearing down the statue. SpinSanity: A spate of misquotes. Political Parrhesia: Unanswered questions. Pirate Blog: Must stand united.... [Read More]
» Mo Better Money from the RANT:
With all of the hand ringing going on about campaign finance reform and the McCain-Feingold act, is there anyone out there who truly believes that democracy is not being negatively impacted by the influence of big money and the constant... [Read More]
» Buying the Office from Modulator
Do you believe that the national elections are important, that the US President is elected by the voters? I do, but after some recent reading I am having some second thoughts and I am not happy about it. First, Craig... [Read More]
» No greater power... from Rhetorica: Press-Politics Journal
Thomas Friedman understands that there is no greater (political) power than the power to name or to define. A noun is... [Read More]
» "We do run the place" from Off the Kuff
When Republicans were the minority party in the House, they routinely complained that Democrats used the Rules Committee to stifle [Read More]
» The Right Flank from the RANT:
Craig Cheslog has dug up a couple of links that are interesting from notable right-wingers. The first is about why President Bush needs to explain the dearth of WMD’s in Iraq from none other then George Will who feels that... [Read More]
» The Right Flank from the RANT:
Craig Cheslog has dug up a couple of links that are interesting from notable right-wingers. The first is about why President Bush needs to explain the dearth of WMD’s in Iraq from none other then George Will who feels that... [Read More]
» Late Night Reading from Modulator
Craig Cheslog has a lot to say today about texans, the budget and North Korea. James Joyner reprises the full text of the 2003 State of the Union speach as part of the ongoing did he or didn't he discussion. Doc Searls shares his experience with the ne... [Read More]
» Late Night Reading from Modulator
Anna and Jake are at the Ignuazu Falls as they find their way back to the UK. Lots of cool travel pictures on this site. Just for you bachelors, Oscar Jr has some housekeeping tips beginning here and working back for two posts. If you are in need of fr... [Read More]
» Late Night Reading from Modulator
Dwight Meredith talks about tort reform and likes a proposal made by Charles Kuffner. This all seems much better then the approach favored by the bushies. Dwight does not have a search feature but a little diligent looking around will find a wealth of ... [Read More]
» A tiger in the tank from Your Guess Is As Good As Mine
While in that "filling the gas tank" trance, perhaps, we might reflect on this paragraph for the "fair and balanced" history books [Read More]
» Taxing our Children from Modulator
Ok, I admit to stealing the title from this Craig Cheslog post which discusses the burden we are placing on our children and likely their children by allowing unnecessary deficits and spending large sums on misplaced policy agendas. I wonder too about ... [Read More]
» A Political Parrhesia from the RANT:
Craig Cheslog is back to blogging after a week and a half break with a vengeance. He was a posting at a pretty good clip addressing such topics as Democratic presidential fund-raising, A Republican senator wondering if the congress is... [Read More]
» A Political Parrhesia from the RANT:
Craig Cheslog is back to blogging after a week and a half break with a vengeance. He was a posting at a pretty good clip addressing such topics as Democratic presidential fund-raising, A Republican senator wondering if the congress is... [Read More]
» A Political Parrhesia from the RANT:
Craig Cheslog is back to blogging after a week and a half break with a vengeance. He was a posting at a pretty good clip addressing such topics as Democratic presidential fund-raising, A Republican senator wondering if the congress is... [Read More]
» Rhetoric Vs Reality from the RANT:
The new liberal think tank, Center for American Progress, has come out swinging with a chart that highlights the difference between the rhetoric of the Bush administration and the actions of it's policy initiatives. Time after time the Administration h... [Read More]
» The Debt Tax from the RANT:
Everyone seems to be popping the corks over the latest job and GDP numbers why but I am getting a sick feeling. Now many will say I’m just a “sour grapes” liberal and I can’t stand to see the policies... [Read More]
» Happy Homeless Alcoholic... I mean, Veterans Day. from Damn the world.
In lieu of Veterans Day upon us, I decided to do a little piece about all the god damn bastards that were meant to die in war, but were instead sent back to our glorious country to be a burden... [Read More]
» Is the draft back? from Modulator
Not exactly what we might think of as the draft but the US is does not have an all volunteer army:To many of the soldiers whose retirements and departures are on ice, however, stop-loss is an inconvenience, a hardship and, in some cases, a personal dis... [Read More]
» Outsourcing roundup from Fried Man
A roundup of recent blogging about outsourcing. Lots of reactions from all over the blogosphere. [Read More]
» Outsourcing roundup from Fried Man
A roundup of recent blogging about outsourcing. Lots of reactions from all over the blogosphere. [Read More]
» How to get out of a Spider Hole from Modulator
Dig Deeper. Via Craig Cheslog.... [Read More]
» Craig's Back from the RANT:
I wondered what happened to the guy, but apparently it's was just a case of life getting in the way of blogging. And it look's like he has been busy… It was not a break I expected to take. But... [Read More]
» In Harm's Way from the RANT:
The recent fad of equating partisan dissent with the presidents policy in Iraq with boraderline treason would be funny if it weren't for the fact that so many people seem to agree with it 100%. That's not funny, it's scary.... [Read More]
» John Kerry's Campaign from Unspun™
Up to now, I've written nothing in support of John Kerry. Up to now, I've seen no reason to do so. Craig Cheslog, writing over at Political Parrhesia, notes some of his favorite lines from John Kerry's acceptance speech last... [Read More]
» Stay on or Ship Out: The Drafting of the Volunteers (aka Coercion at Carson) from fogwave [dot] org
A recent article is reporting the military is using new scare tactics to coerce soldiers at Fort Carson (many of whom have already served in Iraq for a year) to re-enlist for at least another 3 years.
"They said if you refuse to re-enlist with the 3... [Read More]
» A Public Service Announcement from the RANT:
Craig Cheslog kindly reminds us that… ...since Bush-Cheney entered office, we've added $1.65 trillion to the national debt. That’s a 23% increase in a little over 3 years. Has GDP increased by 23%? Right now debt service is the third... [Read More]
» Our Government Working Hard Protecting Us. from Oblogatory Anecdotes
On September 11th 2001 a band of kindergarten kids armed with pocketknives supplied by a terrorist organization known as the Boy Scouts of America seized control of several aircraft and flew them into the World Trade Center, and the Pentagon.
The ... [Read More]
Comments
YOU NOT BE A CUB FAN AFTER OVER 20 YEARS! THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE. BUT ARIK WILL HAVE FUN WITH DADDY.
Posted by: MOM | July 7, 2002 11:34 AM
In the last three days, I flew on four flights. And was searched four times. How is it that a petite, harmless looking white female is chosen "at random" so frequently? With 2 searches for each time I "cleared security", I was searched 100% more than if *every* passenger were searched upon entering the airport. They seemed to take a long time with each search, perhaps hesitant to ask yet another passenger to submit to a thorough inspection; during one search, my flip-flops were examined for 5 minutes (including an x-ray exam) to ensure they were clear of any hidden objects.
Posted by: Kari | July 7, 2002 12:58 PM
if Bush has over-reached, then do what the constitution requires of us - impeachment.
Posted by: jp | July 7, 2002 10:52 PM
JP:
I think we need to rely on Congress to take an aggressive oversight role. I believe that is the proper avenue for this debate, at least for now.
I don't think Bush's proposals are "high crimes and misdemeanors." While I wish the president would back off, it is time for Congress to fulfill its Constitutional function.
Posted by: Craig Cheslog | July 8, 2002 12:57 PM
Nice quotes, I feel the same way!
Posted by: myDD | July 10, 2002 12:54 PM
As long as most of Americans are 'asleep at thee wheel' when it comes to interest in politics, there is no end to what will happen. I never imagined that a Conservative would be so instrumental in ripping away the rights of the American people.
Next stop, the interent!
Posted by: Steve | August 14, 2002 8:32 PM
Thiss good news for your dad and you. But I still think beer is a waste of good money. Maybe the beer is way your Dad is healthy for a "Older Cheslog"!
Posted by: Pat | August 15, 2002 2:48 AM
These actions from the Justice Department are a bit dicey.
I don't think it has much to do with conservatism or liberalism. It is hubris and paternalism.
Either way, it has to stop.
My best,
-- Craig
Posted by: Craig Cheslog | August 15, 2002 11:51 AM
Hardly a surprise. Texas "justice" has had more than a few black eyes lately, as Bob Herbert (NYTimes) has catalogued:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/columns/
Posted by: greg | August 20, 2002 8:01 PM
A nice site, you've got some good material here
:-)
Posted by: Ewar Woowar | September 4, 2002 8:18 AM
Huh? I thought those personality traits were pretty much SOP for politicians.
Posted by: Bill Quick | September 5, 2002 6:31 PM
I wouldn't say that such traits are SOP for politicians. Good people do enter politics for the right reasons.
More important, the successful jerks in the political game learn how to hide their worst traits in public.
A fact Cuomo clearly has yet to accept.
My best,
-- Craig
Posted by: Craig Cheslog | September 6, 2002 7:59 AM
An interesting site, nice one!
Posted by: Ewar | September 11, 2002 5:49 AM
Nor is the problem necessarily as big as the amount of ink spilled about it would suggest.
Posted by: Sean Kirby | September 15, 2002 6:41 PM
The Miami Herald missed one of the biggest issues with electronic voting - lack of paper trail. The bottom line is that electronic voting requires voters to trust software. Any one who uses or develops software on a regular basis knows that software can be buggy, or worse yet, intentionally manipulated.
Any electronic voting system needs to generate a paper confirmation slip which the voter would confirm (not by signing, however, since the vote must be kept anonymous) and then deposit in an old fashioned locked box. The boxes of paper ballots would be available for post-election recounts, media review, etc.
I wonder why Florida chose to disregard the viewpoint of Rebecca Mercuri? (http://www.notablesoftware.com/evote.html, http://www.notablesoftware.com/RMstatement.html)
Posted by: Paul F | September 20, 2002 7:50 AM
Paul:
That is an excellent point. It is a great question Florida elections officials should answer.
-- Craig
Posted by: Craig Cheslog | September 20, 2002 10:55 AM
Hi, this is a cool site. I just came to you through BlogSnob. :)
Posted by: Michelle | September 21, 2002 3:42 PM
Don't think it's a recipe for chaos at all. Very rarely will any party be willing to take thier establsihed candidate out of a race and put in anyone else, and when they do, the likely outcome will be voter rejection of such a gambit.
For instance, much mention has been made of the N.Y. governor's race: why not just gut McCall and put in someone else? I mean, he has this scandal and he didn't have a chance before -- now he's toast? there is NO chance that the Dems will pressure him to drop out and replace him with someone else. This just isn't going to become a trend.
The N.J. Supreme Court followed well established principles of legeslative interpretation and their own previously establsihed caselaw. Their decision was non-partisan (as you know, most of them are Republicans). Their decision was correct.
Posted by: Tom Burka | October 5, 2002 11:07 AM
Dear Tom:
One quick clarification: while six of the seven NJ justices were appointed by a Republican, four are Democrats, two are Republicans, and one is an independent.
I do worry about the precedent this sets. Political operatives are trained to take advantage of loopholes like this one. It may take an election cycle for this opportunity to sink in, but if the parties do not feel they will face voter retribution for such shenanigans, we'll see this again soon.
I write this as someone who wants the Democrats to retain control of the Senate. But while this NJ decision is wrapped in a "voters rights" blanket, the fact is that the voters in NJ knew that the Torch was ethically challenged when they renominated him in their primary.
The party bosses already control far too much of this process. Now we are going to allow them to overrule primary decisions because of poor polling a little more than a month out from an election?
I hope I'm wrong, but the precedent is quite dangerous.
My best,
-- Craig
Posted by: Craig Cheslog | October 6, 2002 9:22 AM
This article is a joke and the writer (if you can call him that) obviously has an agenda. Absurd.
Posted by: joe | October 9, 2002 1:54 PM
Joe:
If only this were absurd. There have been numerous media reports about the problems facing the air marshal program. You can recognize the problem or ignore it.
By the way, all writers have agendas. I regret that this obvious fact of life surprises you.
My best,
-- Craig
Posted by: Craig Cheslog | October 11, 2002 10:41 AM
If US want to disarm Iraq, it must disarm itself
because they do have weapons of mass distruction.
India and Pakistan displayed their own nucluer weapons and UN said nothing. I think UN must redefine itself clearly as to whether its a US organisation or what?
Posted by: Thabo | October 23, 2002 11:11 AM
By the way thanks to North Korea for saving what seemed like another world war.
Posted by: Thabo | October 23, 2002 11:14 AM
By the way thanks to North Korea for saving another world war
Posted by: Thabo | October 23, 2002 11:14 AM
By the way thanks to North Korea for saving what seemed like another world war.
Posted by: Thabo | October 23, 2002 11:14 AM
By the way thanks to North Korea for saving what seemed like another world war.
Posted by: Thabo | October 23, 2002 11:14 AM
I heard an interesting theory today (on CNN, I believe) from an ex-police chief. His thought was that Chief Moose, being no slouch in the police field, managed a splendid acting job regarding several of these "leaks." He believes it is entirely possible that necessary information was intentionally "leaked" to the press instead of being officially disseminated in order to allow the police to appear in public and get the dialogue going with the sniper by being able to say things like "We're SO sorry this info leaked out. We didn't mean to upset you. Can you call back, please?" while getting the info out there. Until Chief Moose weighs in, if he ever does, we have no way of knowing if this was his actual course of action, but, then again, we don't know that it wasn't...... (It is interesting, though, given that the combination of leaked info and getting the suspects to call back and spill a bit too much info was what did them in in the end.....)
Posted by: Pamela | October 27, 2002 2:13 PM
Baraka said that 4,000 Isreali workers were told to stay home. Although what Baraka said is still a lie, he did not point out a religion, but a country.
Posted by: Michael D'Agostino | November 13, 2002 6:53 PM
I wonder if changing the tax code to favor corporate dividends over capitol gains would result in more honest corporate accounting.
Posted by: Joe Diamond | November 21, 2002 4:12 AM
werd up, that is the dumbest thing i have ever heard. let the people live. that n this cellphone bullshit.
Sycho KiD
Queens NYC since my birth n always
Posted by: Sycho KiD | November 21, 2002 11:28 AM
Dear Mr. Morrison,
I read your article of Nov. 18th and I know that many prohibited items got through the checkpoints as soon as the new screeners took over. While the contract screeners were testing and training to get their jobs back, the new screeners were inexperienced on the x-ray machines! They needed to get certified for the x-ray before they got on the checkpoint. It took them several attempts to get certified while the public was passing through the checkpoints and that included the leads and supervisors!! After the incumbent screeners got back, they were used primarily on the x-ray machines because the mobile screeners were burnt out. The mobile screeners knew how bad the new screeners were on the x-ray machines so they had to carry the blunt of the x-ray time, After six weeks at my airport, the new screeners still need more x-ray time to catch more prohibited items. The checkpoints should have never been taken over by inexperienced personnel all at one time. That was a dangerous situation for the traveling public.
Many good screeners lost their jobs because of the testing. We did need SOME personnel changes but not the massive overhaul that took place at taxpayer expense. Those of us, who did pass, didn’t even have a lead or supervisor job open to us because inexperienced people took the positions. The new screeners are starting to wear down with the traveling public already. They just saw a government position and did not really know what the job entailed. They are NOT any better than the old screeners. My new uniform changes the public’s view of me but not my ability to do my job, which I really enjoy. Next week starts the busy holiday season and you should check the long lines then and see how the new screeners wear down. Since I have been back to work, I have seen more lazy people because all the new screeners want to be in management and not screen passengers. The TSA hasn’t even started testing screeners with the TIP Program on the x-ray machines yet because they know there will be a high failure rate. The old screeners were tested three times each a day by Globe. If they failed, they had to be retrained before they could get back on the checkpoint. If they failed TSA testing, it was a three-day suspension without pay. After the second TSA failure on a test, it was termination! The new screeners are going to drop like flies when that happens.
The INS should have taken the blame for the 911 hijackings and not the screeners. Box-cutters were allowed before 911! The INS should have kept a better track of the hijackers visas and even the serial sniper in the D.C. area would have not been able to kill all those people. The old screeners were made scapegoats. A funny thing happened the other day at the airport. This employee at the airport told me,” I’m glad you people are in charge now because you are friendlier than the other screeners,” I told her,” I’m the same guy who changed your tire in the employee parking lot and you said Hello to me ever since. Now with a white uniform you don’t remember me!” She was really embarrassed! Wearing white or being white does seem to make the public think they are better protected.
Posted by: Mendr | November 23, 2002 11:14 PM
Bush Rocks!
Posted by: Jack | November 25, 2002 1:50 PM
Bush Rocks!
Posted by: Jack | November 25, 2002 1:51 PM
AS a teenager i know that a lot of us like to critisize everything aroung us and the government is no exception, but i fell the only way to can have the right to critisize the government is if your active in changing it. at this point in our lives the only way we can change the government is by voting and to voice our opinion on election day.
Fay
Posted by: fay | December 15, 2002 8:41 AM
It is sad that good works are so quickly forgotten when someone gets into trouble. Trent Lott has been a good friend to Mississippians as well as faithful to his country.
I think his comment has been taken completely as a chance for the few who like to keep the race issues stirred to a stink.
Has anyone stopped to think what good he has done for the economy of Mississippi? Has anyone thought what it could mean for us if he remains in the top position? Think of the Raytheon contracts he has brought the state. Without his pull we would not have gotten Nissan. Pascagoula is reaping rewards of his work. I could go on, but you get the meaning.
I think the media interveiwing any and everyone just to keep the "story" alive is a big reason that Mr. Lott has caught so much grief.
Now really, Do you think Mr. Lott is a racist????
I don't.
J. Crane
Walnut Grove,Ms
Posted by: Jane Crane | December 18, 2002 3:50 PM
People need to have some type of way to correct "wrongs", but there has to be some sanity to the system. If you are disabled for life, then maybe a few million is right for you. But for the majority of cases where theres hardly anything wrong they should get a much smaller sum. Doctors shouldn't have to be afraid to practice.
Posted by: Blaine Hilton | January 5, 2003 9:58 AM
Of course it is about oil! Look at the the people on the planes that hit the WTC and the Pentagon, 95% of them were from Saudi Arabia, but because we get oil from them we leave them and instead decide to go after Iraq....
Okay, I'm done ranting
Posted by: Blaine Hilton | January 5, 2003 8:20 PM
Dear Candidate Dean, We here in NH are encouraged
that you are running for President.
We urge you to speak out against the future war
in Iraq this oil-driven president of the US is leading us into.
On January 18, 2003 people will again be demonstrating for peace in Washington, D.C. and it
would be wonderful if you would join them and speak out about the perils of a war.
The only person who has spoken out before this is
Mr. Sharpton, and we need you to be there and speak out also. Look at the love everyone was showing for Paul Wellstone because he spoke up.
Please be there on the 18th. Thank you.
I'd be there too but at age 82 it's a bit of a journey to take the bus to D.C. and back all in 24
hours.
Most sincerely, Helen L. Crowe, Claremont, NH
Posted by: Helen Crowe | January 6, 2003 7:28 AM
i think he's cocky, if you will.
Posted by: suburbanwit | January 11, 2003 12:40 AM
Craig,
As a fellow deficit hawk, I agree with you and the Concord Coalition 100%.
I'm e-mailing you my anti-tax-cut column from the Jan. 12 Philadelphia Inquirer. Keep up the drumbeat.
Douglas Pike
Posted by: Douglas Pike | January 12, 2003 9:51 AM
Now my question is did he do this because this would be his last chance, or did he really mean it?
Posted by: Blaine | January 12, 2003 9:51 AM
Douglas:
Thank you for sending the link to your excellent column. I comment about it here.
Future generations will not take kindly to our refusal to prepare for the boomers impending retirement.
Posted by: Craig Cheslog | January 12, 2003 1:55 PM
I feel very strongly towards this issue and hope to start some kind of group at my college to discuss and also push for this possible 28th amendment. I hope to get feedback from all the people that I meet.
Posted by: Cristina Mitchell | January 12, 2003 2:04 PM
absolutely we should be sceptical. And it's seemed to me that because the administration has been using any pretext whatsoever to justify anterior geopolitical goals, that perhaps no evidence would be forthcoming. but now what do we do with:
"But while in public the inspectors were celebrating their discovery of the artillery shells, in private experts from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna were digesting the details of a substantially more significant find - the blueprint of Saddam's nuclear weapons project.
On the same morning that a team of inspectors had found the 12 artillery shells, another team of nuclear weapons experts had paid a surprise visit to the homes of two of Saddam's leading nuclear physicists who worked for Iraq's top secret for the Ministry of Military Industrialisation (MMI)."
from
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/01/19/wirq219.xml
(p.s. great weblog, craig!)
Posted by: tim | January 18, 2003 9:11 PM
HELLO HOW ARE YOU DOING TODAY I AM A STUDENT AT SELMA HIGH SCHOOL AND OUR AMERICAN GOV TEAHCER ASK US TO FIND THE DIFF IN POLITICAL AND POLITICS IF YOU CAN PLEASE TELL ME THANK
Posted by: DERRIUS | January 21, 2003 3:17 PM
How insightful. I think there is also the fear of forwarding a projection of a sense of assimilation with African American culture in America. That has conservative America shaking in their sleep. There is a latent fear of reprisal by Africans Americans for the past/current state of affairs. And so their fears keep them from fullu accepting the profound work of MLK. Isn't it interesting that we actually celebrate his birthday on a day that is actually not his birthday. And isn't just as interesting the General Lee's birthday precedes MLK's by four days. The two celebrations could not be further apart in ideologies.
Posted by: David | January 22, 2003 1:30 PM
I think what Bloomberg has done is the best thing. I don't need to be breathing in the smoke that is blown out by people who do smoke. If you read up on second-hand smoke it is the most horrible thing. Although it isn't a proven fact, I'm sure everything they are saying is accurate. It's your right to smoke and do what every you wish, but it is also mine not to be involved and have to inhale the smoke.
Posted by: Zena | January 22, 2003 2:59 PM
I think what Bloomberg has done is the best thing. I don't need to be breathing in the smoke that is blown out by people who do smoke. If you read up on second-hand smoke it is the most horrible thing. Although it isn't a proven fact, I'm sure everything they are saying is accurate. It's your right to smoke and do what every you wish, but it is also mine not to be involved and have to inhale the smoke.
Posted by: Zena | January 22, 2003 2:59 PM
What about BPI (boost-phase intercept)? Do you think it is viable? Why not spend a little money and time on it?
Posted by: Vince Sola | February 11, 2003 5:35 PM
Isn't it scarry?
What I find funny though is you can go to the website and donate money to help the national debt. If every person in the country "donated" $1,000 I don't believe it would change by even 1%! Give me a break......
Posted by: Blaine | February 20, 2003 8:12 AM
It seems to me that we're having trouble getting our act together largely because we can't agree that terrorism needs to be stopped at the source. If we don't do that, no amount of preparedness on the home front will matter in the long run. The terrorists will eventually get the WMDs they want, and they'll eventually use them against us right here. Take the fight to them--that's the way to win.
Posted by: Bryan | February 24, 2003 2:10 PM
It is worse than satire.
There is new science out that shows that drugs do not cause addiction. Pain causes addiction.
http://www.sierratimes.com/03/01/20/simon.htm - the politics of pain
Posted by: M. Simon | February 24, 2003 11:45 PM
World Peace? Of course that is what we will have after the whole world starts nuking each other.
Posted by: Blaine | March 4, 2003 8:57 AM
If you think Mexico has always been a close ally and friend of the U.S., you haven't been following history for the past several hundred years. Our relationship has at the least been contentious. See http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/000321.html for a discussion of the predecessor to the Krugman column. There are several links at the end of http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/000293.html which you might find enlightening.
Posted by: Lonewacko | March 8, 2003 11:56 AM
Bush is trying to stay out of the public spot light, because he doesn't want any "tough" questions.
Posted by: Blaine | March 9, 2003 11:24 AM
Blaine:
There's no doubt about that. But conducting press conferences and answering to the media and the American people is part of the job.
Bush can ignore calls for more press conferences. Those of us who think that such accountability is important need to keep making this point regardless.
My best,
-- Craig
Posted by: Craig Cheslog | March 9, 2003 11:31 AM
Shocking, truly shocking. Here's evidence of problems someone else had at another protest:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/030305/168/3fgvq.html
Say, is there any proof available of the problems the AJC lady had? You know, like pictures or something? I mean, there were a lot of photogs there, including from the AJC, one would think there'd be at least one pic or two.
Posted by: Lonewacko | March 9, 2003 8:56 PM
Shocking, truly shocking. Here's evidence of problems someone else had at another protest:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/030305/168/3fgvq.html
Say, is there any proof available of the problems the AJC lady had? You know, like pictures or something? I mean, there were a lot of photogs there, including from the AJC, one would think there'd be at least one pic or two.
Posted by: Lonewacko | March 9, 2003 8:56 PM
Shocking, truly shocking. Here's evidence of problems someone else had at another protest:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/030305/168/3fgvq.html
Say, is there any proof available of the problems the AJC lady had? You know, like pictures or something? I mean, there were a lot of photogs there, including from the AJC, one would think there'd be at least one pic or two.
Posted by: Lonewacko | March 9, 2003 8:57 PM
I strongly believe that the Democratic Party must go back to its roots [serving those who truly need, etc.]in order to survive as a political force in this country...Gov. Dean seems to be the first democrate in years to hold to this idea...if he doesn't get more exposure and get his/the Democratic ideal out there we may be forced again to support another so so democratic contender to face Bush...Bush will be beatable in 04 if we can get a true demo. candidate!!!
George St.George
Posted by: George St.George | March 11, 2003 7:50 AM
I strongly believe that the Democratic Party must go back to its roots [serving those who truly need, etc.]in order to survive as a political force in this country...Gov. Dean seems to be the first democrate in years to hold to this idea...if he doesn't get more exposure and get his/the Democratic ideal out there we may be forced again to support another so so democratic contender to face Bush...Bush will be beatable in 04 if we can get a true demo. candidate!!!
George St.George
Posted by: George St.George | March 11, 2003 7:50 AM
u suc
Posted by: chad m | March 11, 2003 10:51 AM
Sometimes I listen to C_SPAN while working & remember hearing those kinds of comments last fall, around the time Bush pushed his Iraq agenda through Congress. It's hard to imagine someone being against the war for this reason, even if it were true.
Just started a blog this week-- if you have time, I'd appreciate any feedback you have.
Posted by: amy | March 13, 2003 7:07 PM
Hi. I am appalled at the rancorous media response to Ms. Maines’ criticism of Bush. If you agree, please sign and forward this open letter.
If you want to show the Dixie Chicks a more dramatic gesture of support, post a copy of this letter at http://dixiechicks.launch.yahoo.com/. If you can’t afford to join the online fan club, you can still voice your support and your prayers. As 2004 approaches, let’s pray for a landslide to bring Bush down!
Dear Ms. Maines,
Thank you for speaking your mind. Thank you for reminding us that this country is still America, at least nominally.
For centuries, the American flag has symbolized freedom and democracy. You have witnessed the international response to the misuse of this banner, and were brave enough to speak of it in the oppressive climate of the Bush regime.
I am proud to be an American, but I am ashamed that my president (or the Supreme Court’s president) has committed us to a course of war. I am also ashamed that there is some justice in the growing international perception of the U.S. as a heedless bully.
Above all, I am ashamed that some of my fellow Americans would rather remain in ignorance of international opinion, and treat a patriot’s criticism as if it were treason.
Sincerely Yours,
Lydia
lyden@netcarrier.com
Posted by: Lydia | March 18, 2003 6:17 AM
Does The United NATIONS OVERULE THE CONSTITUTION IN THE CASE OF WAR,LIKE WHAT HAS HAPPENED WITH IRAQ THIS PAST WEEK,IS THIS REALLY ILLEGAL AND BY WHOM,THE UN,THE CONSTITION, OR BOTH.
I AM BEING TOLD THAT THIS IS ALL UP TO THE UN,AND THAT THE CONSTITUTION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT,THAT IT'S OLD,AND THE UN IS NEW AND THEY RULE.
THIS HAS NEVER BEEN MY WAY OF THINKING!
Posted by: Pat | March 24, 2003 11:38 AM
Does The United NATIONS OVERULE THE CONSTITUTION IN THE CASE OF WAR,LIKE WHAT HAS HAPPENED WITH IRAQ THIS PAST WEEK,IS THIS REALLY ILLEGAL AND BY WHOM,THE UN,THE CONSTITION, OR BOTH.
I AM BEING TOLD THAT THIS IS ALL UP TO THE UN,AND THAT THE CONSTITUTION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT,THAT IT'S OLD,AND THE UN IS NEW AND THEY RULE.
THIS HAS NEVER BEEN MY WAY OF THINKING!
Posted by: Pat | March 24, 2003 11:39 AM
Does The United NATIONS OVERULE THE CONSTITUTION IN THE CASE OF WAR,LIKE WHAT HAS HAPPENED WITH IRAQ THIS PAST WEEK,IS THIS REALLY ILLEGAL AND BY WHOM,THE UN,THE CONSTITION, OR BOTH.
I AM BEING TOLD THAT THIS IS ALL UP TO THE UN,AND THAT THE CONSTITUTION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT,THAT IT'S OLD,AND THE UN IS NEW AND THEY RULE.
THIS HAS NEVER BEEN MY WAY OF THINKING!
Posted by: Pat | March 24, 2003 11:39 AM
Does The United NATIONS OVERULE THE CONSTITUTION IN THE CASE OF WAR,LIKE WHAT HAS HAPPENED WITH IRAQ THIS PAST WEEK,IS THIS REALLY ILLEGAL AND BY WHOM,THE UN,THE CONSTITION, OR BOTH.
I AM BEING TOLD THAT THIS IS ALL UP TO THE UN,AND THAT THE CONSTITUTION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT,THAT IT'S OLD,AND THE UN IS NEW AND THEY RULE.
THIS HAS NEVER BEEN MY WAY OF THINKING!
Posted by: Pat | March 24, 2003 11:40 AM
You sound like a traitor to me. Please do not question the motives of this administration. George Bush in 2004!! It's gonna be a landslide - or else.
Posted by: George Butcher | March 31, 2003 8:52 AM
Tied for the lead...with the Cardinals :)
Posted by: Caleb | March 31, 2003 10:10 PM
That is, of course a good point. As a Cubs fan, however, I have to celebrate now while I have the chance. :)
Posted by: Craig Cheslog | April 1, 2003 7:27 PM
Hell yeah!
So Patterson is on pace for what, 324 home runs this year? That should go well with Sosa's pace of 162. :)
This kind of start sure beats that 0-14 start a few years back. That was terrible.
Craig, where are you from? It's always to know there's other Cubs fans blogging!
Kris
Posted by: Kris Lofgren | April 1, 2003 7:31 PM
It's a sociopathic individual who is "rooting for a quagmire." Rooting for a quagmire and predicting one are two different things.
I do, however, think vomiting on public buildings and the like is going to do the movement more harm than good. And I suspect the people who engage in such activity are grandstanding more than they are "protesting."
Posted by: John | April 2, 2003 3:52 PM
I was beginning to wonder if I was the only person to be outraged by that story.... Here's something to ponder... why didn't the REPORTER ask those questions? The story seemed like a cutesy little 'slice of life during war-time' piece of fluff. Some fluff.
Posted by: david | April 6, 2003 8:46 AM
Thanks for the link to my Cubs blog!
Posted by: Jason Steffens | April 6, 2003 1:32 PM
outrageous. And one suspects it's a ripple effect from the inappropriate proposals for faith-based funding and pronouncements to the tune "(My christian)God has chosen me to lead at this time" coming from the top.
Posted by: timothy | April 6, 2003