A Lack of Shock and Awe

| No Comments

While I have no doubt that the United States military will eventually defeat Saddam, we have learned that one of our military planners' new theories was somewhat overoptimistic.

No, that's a bit too kind. It was wrong. As Slate's Fred Kaplan notes:

Gen. Tommy Franks, commander of U.S. Central Command, told reporters on March 22, "This will be a campaign unlike any other in history—a campaign characterized by shock, by surprise, by flexibility …"

But what if the enemies are not shocked or surprised—or if they are at first, but then quickly recover and launch their own campaign of shock and surprise?

We will regroup, of course. We will win this war.

The problem, in the end, were the misrepresentations made by the Bush Administration about how easy the war would be to win. Compared to other wars through history, this war is going quite well.

But the expectations were not based on what happened in history. They were based on misstatements made by leading Bush Administration officials.

Misstatements that must be remembered.

Leave a comment

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Craig Cheslog published on March 26, 2003 9:59 PM.

There Was Manipulation in the California Energy Crisis was the previous entry in this blog.

Powell's Middle East Road Map is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.